Gretchen Pagnotta
(760) 715-0478
Return HOME
MLS Search
VIP MLS Login
Featured Listings
Property Search
Email Me
Community Profile
School Resource
About Us
Client Testimonials
Contact Request Form
Our Buyer's Specialist
Home Value Form
Relocation Form
Fine Homes Form
San Diego Dog Parks
Language Translator
Entertainment
Useful Tools
International Real Estate
U.S. Real Estate
Buying A Home???
Selling A Home???
Real Estate Finance
Relocation Source
 

 

 

 

 

 


Are you interested in purchasing a short sale? Click here to get the latest listings in areas you are considering.
 

 
 
 
Breaking News Mortgage Servicing Settlement
 
Here are a few highlights from Kathy Merringer Coldwell Banker post:
 
 Based on the information currently available the Agreement applies to the following servicers:
 
Bank of America / Countrywide
877-488-7814
 
JPMorgan Chase / WaMu
866-372-6901
 
Citibank / Citimortgage
866-272-4749
 
Wells Fargo / Wachovia
800-288-3212
 
Ally Financial / GMAC (May 2012 filed for Chapter 11 protection under DBA Capital Residential)
800-766-4622
 
According the CA Attorney General there are another dozen who may opt into the Agreement before long. The reality is there remains much confusion with respect to what impact the Agreement may have on the Short Sale process and which entities will be bound by its term’s. For example there are those who hold that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA and VA are not drawn into the Agreement yet others are confident they are!  Watch for more to come on this topic.
 
The Agreement addresses many different mortgage related issues, but this post narrowly focuses on those issues that may impact the Short Sale process.  
 
Insofar as implementation, for the most part, we are months away, though some servicers indicate that they may be ready prior to the actual deadline for compliance.  
 
 
1) The servicers shall make their general Short Sale requirements known to the public.
 
2) The servicers shall consider appropriate financial incentives to underwater borrowers.
 
3) The servicers shall develop a cooperative Short Sale process and make that process available to the borrower prior to the listing.
 
4) The servicer shall send written confirmation of the first Short Sale request to borrower / borrower’s  agent within ten days of receipt provided the request is accompanied by a third party authorization.  Confirmation shall include basic Short Sale information.  Any deficiency demand, if permitted by state law, must be boldly stated (not permitted by CA law).
 
5) Servicers shall send, upon written request, notice of any missing documents within 30 days of receipt of the request.
 
6) Servicer shall review and communicate disposition no later than 30 days after receipt of all required documentation and third party authorization.
 
7) Servicer shall, if Short Sale is accepted, notify borrower a deficiency or cash contribution/note is required if permitted by state law (not permitted in CA).  If the Short Sale is denied servicer shall provide the reasons for denial.
 
Another variable are the allotted pay offs offered to junior lien holders.  If the junior and the senior lien holders are both obligated under the terms of the Agreement the junior is to accept the amount offered by the senior. The new amounts vary by servicer; stay tuned for more details on this point.
 
Because Short Sales and Foreclosures run on a “dual track” the Agreement is said to have some restrictions on the servicer’s right to foreclose while the Short Sale process is underway.  We have yet to gain clarity regarding the realistic impact on foreclosure process during a Short Sale.  
 
As of this writing those of use living and working in California are waiting to hear whether or not the Home Owner Bill of Rights will pass and become law.  This Bill is a sweeping piece of legislation that will have significant impact on the foreclosure process, loan modifications and short sales.  Essentially the Bill will slow down the foreclosure process to allow more homeowners to remain in their homes.  
 
Mortgage Servicers Settlement Notes

The servicers will be required to dedicate $20 billion to various forms of relief to borrowers.

Principal reduction. At least $10 billion will be dedicated to reducing

principal for borrowers who, as of the date of the settlement, owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth and are either delinquent or at imminent risk of default.

Refinancing. At least $3 billion will be dedicated to a refinancing program

for borrowers who are current on their mortgages but who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. All borrowers who meet basic eligibility criteria will be eligible for the refinancing, which will reduce interest rates for borrowers who are currently paying much higher rates or whose adjustable rate mortgages are due to soon rise to much higher rates.

Other forms of relief. Servicers will be required to dedicate up to $7 billion

to other forms of relief, including forbearance of principal for unemployed borrowers, anti-blight programs, short sales and transitional assistance, benefits for service members who are forced to sell their homes at a loss as a result of a Permanent Change in Station, and other programs.

To encourage servicers to provide relief quickly, there are incentives for relief provided within the first 12 months – and additional cash payments required for any servicer that fails to meet its obligation within three years.

Servicers will receive only partial credit for every dollar spent on some of the required activities, so the settlement will provide direct benefits to borrowers in excess of $20 billion.
 

FACT SHEET:

MORTGAGE SERVICING SETTLEMENT

PAYMENTS TO STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS:

In addition to the $20 billion of financial relief for homeowners, the servicers will make $5 billion in cash payments to the states and federal government. Of the $5 billion:

Payments to Foreclosed Borrowers. Through the settlement, a $1.5 billion

Borrower Payment Fund will be established to provide cash payments to borrowers whose homes were sold or taken in foreclosure between and including Jan. 1, 2008 and Dec. 31, 2011, and who meet other criteria. This program is distinct from, but complimentary to, the restitution program currently being administered by federal banking regulators to compensate those who suffered direct financial harm as a result of wrongful servicer conduct.

1

State and federal payments. The remaining funds will go to state and federal governments to

be used to repay public funds lost as a result of servicer misconduct, fund housing counselors, legal aid, and other similar purposes determined by state attorneys general. The funds coming to the federal government will primarily be allocated to the FHA Capital Reserve Account, with portions also going to the Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund and to the Rural Housing Service.

FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SERVICERS:

NEW SERVICING STANDARDS:

Servicers are agreeing to implement extensive new servicing standards, designed to correct the kinds of conduct that harmed consumers during recent years.

• Stop many past foreclosure abuses, such as robo-signing, improper documentation and lost

paperwork through new mortgage servicing standards.

• Require strict oversight of foreclosure processing, including of third-party vendors.

• Impose new standards to ensure the accuracy of information provided in federal bankruptcy

court, including pre-filing reviews of certain documents.

• Make foreclosure a last resort, by requiring servicers to evaluate homeowners for other loan

mitigation options first.

• Restrict banks from foreclosing while the homeowner is being considered for a loan

modification.

• Set procedures and timelines for reviewing loan modification applications, and give

homeowners the right to appeal denials.

• Create a single point of contact for borrowers seeking information about their loans and

adequate staff to handle calls.

 

BENEFITS TO SERVICEMEMBERS AND VETERANS:

The settlement contains a number of provisions designed both to protect servicemembers’ rights under the law and to provide them significant additional benefits.

Wrongful foreclosures. To resolve allegations of liability that have not previously been

settled, Chase, Citi, Wells Fargo, and Ally have agreed to conduct a full review, overseen by the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, to determine whether any servicemembers were foreclosed on in violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) since January 1, 2006. Ally, Citi, Wells Fargo will be required to provide any servicemember who was a victim of a wrongful foreclosure as a result of a violation of the SCRA with a payment equal to the servicemember’s lost equity, plus interest, and an additional $116,785 or an amount provided for the same violation under the review conducted by the banking regulators, whichever is higher. To ensure consistency with an earlier settlement, JP Morgan Chase will provide any servicemember who was a victim of a wrongful foreclosure as a result of a violation of the SCRA either his or her home free and clear of any debt plus compensation for additional harm or the cash equivalent of the full value the home at the time of sale plus compensation for additional harm. The compensation for servicemembers wrongful foreclosed on is in addition to the $25 billion settlement amount.

Interest Charged in Excess of 6%. To resolve allegations of liability that have not previously

been settled, Citi, Wells Fargo, and Ally have also agreed to conduct a thorough review, overseen by the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, to determine whether any servicemember, from January 1, 2008 to the present, was charged interest in excess of 6% on their mortgage, after a valid request to lower the interest rate, in violation of the SCRA. Servicers will be required to provide any servicemember who was wrongfully charged interest in excess of 6% with a payment equal to a refund, with interest, of any amount charged in excess of 6% plus triple the amount refunded or $500, whichever is larger. This compensation for servicemembers is in addition to the $25 billion settlement amount.

PCS orders. Under the Department of Defense’s Homeowners’ Assistance Program (HAP),

certain service members who are forced to sell their home at a specified loss due to a Permanent Change in Station (PCS) may be partially compensated for the loss in their home’s value. However, under the governing statute for HAP, only certain PCS servicemembers are eligible for benefits. Under this settlement, all of the participating servicers will provide mandatory short sale agreements and deficiency waivers to certain servicemembers who are currently ineligible for HAP.

Veterans Housing Benefit Program. $10 million will be paid into the Veterans Housing Benefit

Program Fund through which the Department of Veterans Affairs guarantees loans provided on favorable terms to eligible veterans. In addition, except where prohibited by statutory requirements, veterans with VA-guaranteed mortgages will be eligible for relief provided through the servicers’ $20 billion consumer relief obligations.

Foreclosure Protections for Servicemembers Receiving Hostile Fire / Imminent Danger Pay.

For loans secured by servicemembers when they were not on active duty, the SCRA prohibits servicers from foreclosing on active duty servicemembers without first securing a court order. The settlement extends this protection to all servicemembers, regardless of when their mortgage was secured, who within nine months of the foreclosure received Hostile Fire/ Imminent Danger Pay and were stationed away from their home.

MORTGAGE SERVICING SETTLEMENT FACT SHEET

3

CLAIMS RESOLVED:

While resolving certain violations of civil law based on the banks’ mortgage loan servicing activities, the United States and the state attorneys general preserved authorities in a number of areas.

Criminal authorities. The United States and the state attorneys general can still pursue

criminal enforcement actions.

Securities claims. The agreement does not prevent the United States from pursuing action

against the banks related to misrepresentations of the quality of loans that were packaged into mortgage-based securities or the conduct that is the focus of the new Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group. The states have also preserved their rights to bring actions related to securitization activities and MERS.

Loan Origination claims. The United States retains its full authority to recover losses – and

penalties – caused to the federal government when a bank failed to satisfy underwriting standards on a government-insured or government-guaranteed loan, with the exception of certain faulty origination practices by Bank of America on FHA-insured loans. These claims were resolved for $1 billion as part of the settlement. FHA retained its administrative authority to recover its actual losses when Bank of America submits an FHA loan for insurance review in the future.

Borrower claims. The settlement does not prevent any claims by individual borrowers who

wish to bring their own lawsuits.

ENFORCEMENT:

Compliance with the settlement will be overseen by Joseph A. Smith, who will serve as Monitor in enforcing the consent judgment. As North Carolina’s banking commissioner since 2002, Smith oversaw implementation of a leading foreclosure-prevention program; he has also served as Chairman of the Conference of State Banks Supervisors and was President Obama’s nominee to serve as Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The Monitor will oversee implementation of the extensive servicing standards required by the settlement; impose penalties of up to $1 million per violation (or up to $5 million for certain repeat violations); and publish regular public reports that identify any quarter in which the Servicer fell short of the standards imposed in the settlement. The settlement will be filed as a Consent Judgment in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and remain in effect for three-and-a-half years.

 
 
What is a SHORT SALE of a home?

HARP Refinance Program Expanded
 
Borrowers who are current on their home loans may be able to refinance for lower interest rates, even if they are seriously upside down.  The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced today that it will broaden the scope of the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) by removing the current 125 percent loan-to-value cap for fixed-rate mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Other program enhancements include, among other things, reducing certain fees, eliminating the need for a new property appraisal if the FHFA has a reliable automated valuation model (AVM) estimate, and extending HARP until the end of 2013.  New federal guidelines for the HARP changes should be released to mortgage lenders and servicers by November 15.
 
The basic eligibility requirements for an enhanced HARP loan are as follows:
Existing mortgage loan must be owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.  To check whether a borrower has a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loan, go to http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/get-assistance/loan-look-up/Pages/default.aspx.
Existing mortgage loan must have been sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac before June 1, 2009.
Existing mortgage loan cannot have been refinanced under HARP previously (except for Fannie Mae loans refinanced between March and May 2009).
Current loan-to-value (LTV) ratio must be more than 80%.
Existing mortgage loan must be current, with no late payments in the past six months, and no more than one late payment in the past 12 months.
More information is available from FHFA at http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/22721/HARP_release_102411_Final.pdf.
For a homeowner who needs to sell but has a mortgage balance higher than the property value, one option is something called a "short sale."
 
 
 
 
 
So what exactly is a short sale? Here are some questions and answers.

Question: What is a short sale?

Answer: A short sale happens when a lender allows a borrower to sell his home for less than what's owed on the mortgage. The lender usually forgives the difference and considers the debt repaid.

Q: How often do short sales occur?

A: Short sales now make up about one in every 10 home sales, according to the National Association of Realtors. That's a lot more than you usually see when the housing market isn't distressed ---- in fact, the NAR doesn't have historical records on short sales before the current downturn because they were such an insignificant segment of the sales market.

Falling home prices have eroded home equity at a rapid pace, making short sales more common. About 16 million homeowners owe more than their homes are worth and would have to seek a short sale if they were forced to sell their homes now.

Q: What's in it for the lenders?

A: Lenders minimize their losses. If the borrower defaults and the bank has to foreclose, there are extra costs to auction the property and maintain it while it's vacant. Foreclosed homes also typically sell for much less than short sales.

Q: What are the drawbacks for the borrower?

A: While not as bad as a foreclosure, a short sale will still blemish a borrower's credit report. A short sale would knock an "A" borrower down to a "B" borrower, while the same borrower would fall to "D+" after a foreclosure, said Ritch Workman, co-owner of Workman Mortgage in Melbourne, Fla.

The extent of the damage also depends on the borrower's credit history before the short sale. A borrower with good credit won't get hit as hard, while a borrower with tarnished credit will feel more pain.

Normally, a borrower would have to pay taxes on the forgiven part of the balance, though the Bush Administration granted homeowners a reprieve that applies to debt forgiven through 2012.

Q: Why is the process so complicated and why does it take so long?

A: Short sales are plagued with snags on both sides. Desperate sellers or inexperienced real estate agents often send in the wrong paperwork, only to get it kicked back. It's an easy mistake to make because each lender requires different documents.

For their part, lenders don't have enough staff to handle the flood of short sale applications. It can take months before a lender will get back to a seller about an offer from a potential buyer. Some deals take more than a year to finish.

And approvals from third parties ---- such as private mortgage insurers, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, and lenders who hold a second mortgage on the house ---- also can slow a short sale.

Q: What should I do if I'm interested in a short sale?

Give us a call so we can discuss all your options. 
619-846-3114 for Alan

The laws are constantly changing! Another good resource is 
http://www.hud.gov/foreclosure/.

 
Information taken from the North County Times, October 11, 2009.

 
 The following information is provided by California Association of Realtors.
 

Short Sale Deficiencies Fact Sheet

General Rule A mortgage lender is generally prohibited from pursuing a deficiency or deficiency judgment for a short sale involving a one-to-four residential unit property.
Prohibited Acts Where applicable, a mortgage lender involved in a short sale is prohibited from engaging in any of the following acts:
 - Collecting a deficiency;
 - Having a borrower owe a deficiency;
 - Requesting a deficiency judgment;
 - Having a court render a deficiency judgment; or
 - Requiring the borrower to pay any additional compensation, aside from the proceeds of the sale, in exchange for written consent to a short sale.
Applicability A borrower is protected under this law if all of the following requirements are met, and no exception applies:
 - Mortgage loan is solely secured by a deed of trust;
 - Mortgage loan is for a one-to-four residential unit property;
 - Borrower sells for less than the outstanding loan balance owed;
 - Lender provides a written short sale approval;
 - Title voluntarily transfers to a buyer by grant deed or other conveyance document recorded in the county where the property is located; and
 - Proceeds of the sale have been tendered to the lender or lender’s agent in accordance with the parties’ agreement.
Exceptions Exceptions include any of the following:
 - Lender seeking damages for fraud or waste;
 - Borrower is a corporation, LLC, or limited partnership;
 - Cross-collateralized loan (special rules apply);
 - Borrower is a political subdivision of the state;
 - Bond lien; or
 - Public utility lien.
Effective Date July 15, 2011.  The new law protects a borrower who closes escrow after the law came into effect on July 15, 2011.  For short sales that closed escrow before July 15, 2011, the borrower may be protected for a first trust deed under the previous law or by asserting other legal arguments.
Practice Tip Regardless of the law, it would be prudent for a borrower to obtain the lender’s written and signed agreement to release the borrower from any and all liability for the mortgage loan, and to report “no deficiency balance” to the credit bureaus.
Legal Authority The full text of Senate Bill 458 (codified as section 580e of the California Code of Civil Procedure) is available at www.leginfo.ca.gov.

Short Sale v. Judicial Foreclosure
Is Homeowner (1-to-4 units) Generally Protected Against Deficiency?

Type of Mortgage Loan

After Short Sale *  

After Judicial Foreclosure* 

First Trust Deed

Yes

Yes, if purchase-money and owner-occupied

Second or Other Junior Trust Deed

Yes

Yes, if purchase-money and owner-occupied

Purchase Money Loan

Yes

Yes, if owner-occupied

Rate-and-Term Refinance

Yes

No

Cash-Out Refinance

Yes

No

Owner Occupied Home

Yes

Yes, if purchase money

Non-Owner Occupied Home

Yes

No

We are happy to discuss all your options if you are having trouble making your payments or just feel your property will not recover from the down turn in the market. Schedule your confidential appointment with us by completing the form below.

 

*Note: Certain exceptions may apply, including fraud, bad faith waste, and for foreclosures, a wiped-out junior when a senior forecloses. Also, no deficiency judgment shall be rendered if a lender forecloses by non-judicial foreclosure (or a trustee’s sale) (CCP § 580d) or if a loan is seller financed (CCP § 580b). Although most lenders in California foreclose by non-judicial foreclosure, the decision to pursue judicial or non-judicial foreclosure is made by the lender, not borrower.
This legal article is just one of the many legal publications and services offered by C.A.R. to its members.

Readers who require specific advice should consult an attorney. We are happy to provide reliable attorneys who can give reasonably priced council on short sale/foreclosures.Contact us: GBPagnotta@gmail.com
 
Are you interested in purchasing a distressed property?  We know before they come to market in many cases! Complete the form below.
 

 

Please fill out this quick and easy form to let me know exactly what you're looking for...

1
Please provide the following contact information:
Name:
Home Phone:
E-mail:
 
2
Please be specific about what you're interested in:
 

By submitting this form with your telephone number you are consenting for this website's authorized representatives to contact you even if your name is on the Federal "Do not call List"

Thank you for submitting your information. We will be in contact with you by phone or email.


Real Estate Websites by Advanced Access © 1998-2013